Real-World Effectiveness of Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide-Binding Monoclonal Antibodies for Migraine Prevention: A Systematic Review.

Background: Migraine is a neurological disease with a high incidence. The new anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies (anti-CGRP mAbs) have demonstrated effectiveness in preventing episodic and chronic migraine. Objective: To collect evidence of the real-world effectiveness of anti-CGRP mAbs by assessing outcomes such as reduction in monthly migraine days (MMDs), reduction in monthly headache days (MHDs), and percentage of patients having a 50% reduction in MMDs. Data Sources: The PubMed database was searched for the period from inception to October 20, 2021. Study Selection and Data Extraction: Of interest for this review were studies that evaluated the real-world effectiveness of anti-CGRP mAbs in terms of MMDs and reduction in MHDs. The search terms included "migraine", "monthly migraine days", and various drug names. The data are reported in terms of patients' baseline characteristics and treatment effectiveness. Data Synthesis: A total of 46 studies were evaluated, of which 30 (enrolling a total of 4273 patients across 10 countries) were included in the systematic review. The greatest absolute reduction in MMD was from 20.4 at baseline to 10.7 after 3 months of treatment. After 6 months, the greatest absolute difference was 10, relative to baseline. The largest absolute reduction in MHD at 3 months was from 22 to 8, whereas at 6 months, the greatest absolute reduction in MHD was 13. The treatment could be considered clinically effective (≥ 50% reduction in MMDs) for 41% of patients at 3 months and about 44% of patients at 6 months. Conclusions: Despite substantial variability in baseline values, this review confirmed the effectiveness of anti-CGRP mAbs, which yielded important clinical reductions in both MMDs and MHDs.

Contexte: La migraine est une maladie neurologique à incidence élevée. Le nouvel anticorps monoclonal qui se lie au peptide lié au gène de la calcitonine (AcM anti-CGRP) a démontré son efficacité pour prévenir les migraines épisodiques et chroniques. Objectif: Recueillir des éléments probants concernant l'efficacité réelle des AcM anti-CGRP en évaluant des résultats comme la réduction du nombre de jours de migraine par mois (JMM), la réduction du nombre de jours de céphalées par mois (JCM) ainsi que le pourcentage de patients ayant une réduction de 50 % du nombre de JMM. Sources des données: La base de données PubMed a été utilisée pour mener une recherche pour la période allant du début jusqu'au 20 octobre 2021. Sélection des études et extraction des données: Les auteurs de la revue se sont intéressés aux études qui avaient évalué l'efficacité réelle des AcM anti-CGRP en termes de réduction du nombre de JMM et du nombre de JCM. Les termes de recherche comprenaient « migraine ¼, « jours de migraine par mois ¼ et divers noms de médicaments. Les données sont rapportées en termes de caractéristiques de base des patients et d'efficacité du traitement. Synthèse des données: Au total, 30 des 46 études répondant aux critères d'inclusion (comprenant un total de 4273 patients dans 10 pays) ont été retenues pour la revue systématique. La réduction absolue de JJM la plus importante était de 20,4 (la base de référence) à 10,7 après 3 mois de traitement. Après 6 mois, la différence absolue la plus importante était de 10 par rapport à la base de référence. La réduction absolue de JCM la plus importante à trois mois était de 22 à 8, alors qu'à 6 mois, la réduction absolue de JCM la plus importante était de 13. Le traitement pouvait être considéré comme cliniquement efficace (≥50 % de réduction de JMM) pour 41 % des patients à 3 mois et environ 44 % des patients à 6 mois. Conclusions: Malgré la variabilité importante des valeurs de la base de référence, cet examen confirme l'efficacité des AcM anti-CGRP, qui ont donné lieu à une réduction importante d'un point de vue clinique du nombre de JMM et de JCM.

The pan-immune-inflammation value is associated with clinical outcomes in patients with advanced TNBC treated with first-line, platinum-based chemotherapy: an institutional retrospective analysis.

Background: Advanced triple-negative breast cancer (aTNBC) has a poor prognosis; thus, there is a need to identify novel biomarkers to guide future research and improve clinical outcomes. Objectives: We tested the prognostic ability of an emerging, complete blood count (CBC)-based inflammatory biomarker, the pan-immune-inflammation value (PIV), in patients with aTNBC treated with first-line, platinum-based chemotherapy. Design: This was a retrospective, monocentric, observational study. Methods: We included consecutive aTNBC patients treated with platinum-based, first-line chemotherapy at our Institution, and for whom baseline (C1) CBC data were available. We collected CBC data early on-treatment, when available. PIV was calculated as: (neutrophil count × platelet count × monocyte count)/lymphocyte count. Patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative advanced breast cancer (aBC) were included in a control, non-TNBC cohort. Results: A total of 78 aTNBC patients were included. When evaluated as a continuous variable, PIV-C1 was associated with worse overall survival (OS; p < 0.001) and progression-free survival (PFS; p < 0.001). On the other hand, when PIV-C1 was assessed on the basis of its quantile distribution, patients with 'high PIV-C1' experienced worse OS [adjusted hazard ratio (HR): 4.46, 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.22-8.99; adjusted p < 0.001] and PFS (adjusted HR: 2.03, 95% CI: 1.08-3.80; adjusted p = 0.027) when compared to patients with 'low PIV-C1'. Higher PIV-C1 was also associated with primary resistance to chemotherapy. Similarly, a higher PIV calculated from CBC at C2D1 (PIV-C2) was associated with worse survival outcomes. We also created a PIV-based score combining information about both PIV-C1 and PIV-C2 and allowing the stratification of patients at low, intermediate, and high risk of death. No association was observed between PIV-C1 and clinical outcomes of HR+/HER2- aBC patients. Conclusion: PIV has a promising prognostic discrimination ability in aTNBC patients treated with first-line, platinum-based chemotherapy. Both baseline and early on-treatment PIV are associated with clinical outcomes and may be exploited for creating PIV-based risk classifiers if further validated.

Prognostic significance of HER2-low status in HR-positive/HER2-negative advanced breast cancer treated with CDK4/6 inhibitors.

Whether Human Epidermal growth factor Receptor 2 (HER2)-low status has prognostic significance in HR + /HER2- advanced Breast Cancer (aBC) patients treated with first-line Endocrine Therapy plus CDK 4/6 inhibitors remains unclear. In 428 patients evaluated, HER2-low status was independently associated with significantly worse PFS and OS when compared with HER2-0 status. Based on our findings, HER2-low status could become a new prognostic biomarker in this clinical setting.

The Pan-Immune-Inflammation Value in Patients with Metastatic Melanoma Receiving First-Line Therapy.

BACKGROUND: Since a non-negligible fraction of patients with metastatic melanoma does not experience long-term disease control, even with immunotherapy and targeted therapy, new biomarkers for patient stratification and treatment tailoring are needed in this setting. OBJECTIVE: We investigated the association of a novel immune-inflammatory blood-based biomarker, the Pan-Immune-Inflammation Value (PIV), with clinical outcomes of patients with metastatic melanoma receiving first-line therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively included patients treated at the Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori of Milan and having an available baseline complete blood cell count (CBC). PIV was calculated as: [neutrophil count (103/mm3) × platelet count (103/mm3) × monocyte count (103/mm3)]/lymphocyte count (103/mm3). RESULTS: A total of 228 patients were included: 119 (52%) had been treated with immunotherapy and 109 (48%) with targeted therapy. PIV was significantly higher in patients with ECOG PS ≥ 1, high disease burden, synchronous metastases, and elevated baseline LDH level. High baseline PIV was independently associated with poor overall survival (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 2.06; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.30-3.29; adjusted P = 0.002) and progression-free survival (adjusted HR 1.56; 95% CI 1.01-2.41; adjusted P = 0.044). High PIV was also associated with primary resistance to both immunotherapy (odds ratio [OR]: 3.98; 95% CI 1.45-12.32; P = 0.005) and targeted therapy (OR: 8.42; 95% CI 2.50-34.5; P < 0.001). PIV showed a promising discrimination ability in terms of AIC and c-index when compared with other CBC-based biomarkers. CONCLUSIONS: PIV may guide the treatment decision process and the development of novel first-line treatment strategies in melanoma, but warrants further study and validation.

Differential Diagnosis and Management of Diarrhea in Patients with Neuroendocrine Tumors.

Diarrhea is a recurrent symptom in patients with neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) and can represent different etiologies; thus, differential diagnosis is challenging. This paper distinguishes the different causes of chronic diarrhea in patients with gastroenteropancreatic NETs, with the aim to identify the most appropriate therapeutic approach. Underlying causes of diarrhea can be multifactorial, including not only diarrhea that is related to specific hormonal hypersecretory syndromes, but also diarrhea that is secondary to the following: extensive surgery which can cause pancreatic exocrine insufficiency or short bowel syndrome, treatment with somatostatin analogs or other antineoplastic agents, and bile acid malabsorption. After initial management of diarrhea with general treatments (dietary modification, use of antidiarrheals), a proper differential diagnosis is necessary to treat patients with specific etiology-driven therapeutic approaches, such as somatostatin analogs, pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy, and tryptophan hydroxylase inhibitors. In conclusion, NETs should be considered in the differential diagnosis of patients suffering from chronic diarrhea, after the exclusion of more common etiologies. Furthermore, physicians should keep in mind that several different etiologies might be responsible for diarrhea occurrence in NET patients. A prompt diagnosis of the actual cause of diarrhea is necessary to guide the treatment and a multidisciplinary approach is mandatory.